full

full
Published on:

21st Jul 2026

How to Identify Winning Opportunities in a Bond Picker's Market

From Zephyr’s Adjusted for Risk podcast, Ryan Nauman interviews Jim Jessup, income strategist at Virtus ETF Solutions, about ETF innovation and today’s fixed income environment. Jessup explains Virtus’s product-development approach: focus on commercially viable ETFs where managers can add alpha rather than chasing trends, and notes some highly specific ETFs may close or the industry may consolidate. On fixed income, he says despite macro and geopolitical noise and a new Fed chair (Warsh), market conditions look relatively normal: prices near par, default rates below but moving toward historical averages, and strong demand shown by oversubscribed new issues. He argues this is a “bond picker’s market” favoring active management, discusses private credit as a growing but varied space with both risks and liquidity benefits, and highlights the surge in AI-related investment-grade issuance as hyperscaler capex increasingly financed by debt.

Learn more about Zephyr here.

Learn more about Virtus Investment Partners here.

00:00 Podcast Kickoff

01:14 Meet Jim Jessup

03:12 ETF Boom Explained

04:05 Product Innovation Filter

06:52 Will ETFs Consolidate

08:22 Fixed Income Snapshot

10:36 Fed Chair And Signals

15:12 Defaults And Debt Wall

19:37 Private Credit Debate

25:14 Cash Yields And Risk

28:11 AI Driven Debt Wave

30:07 Where To Learn More

Connect with Ryan Nauman:

LinkedIn

X

Transcript
Speaker:

Go

2

:

Ryan Nauman Market Strategist Zephyr:

Welcome everyone to Zephyr's

3

:

Adjusted for Risk podcast

from the shores of Lake Tahoe.

4

:

I am Ryan Nauman, the market

strategist here at Zephyr.

5

:

Fixed income has come under a lot of

fire recently as a lot of strategists

6

:

have become very bearish on bonds,

and there are reasons to be bearish.

7

:

There's inflation, a new Fed chair,

elevated interest rates, and maybe

8

:

even the biggest elephant in the

room is the health of private credit.

9

:

I have on the perfect guest to shed

some light on these topics and what

10

:

it all means for financial advisors

as they build investment portfolios.

11

:

first, this episode is sponsored

by the award-winning Zephyr, which

12

:

helps investment professionals

make more informed investment

13

:

decisions on behalf of their clients.

14

:

All right, enough from me.

15

:

I've already talked enough.

16

:

Let's go ahead and bring

on the star of the show.

17

:

I am honored and very excited

to welcome Jim Jessup.

18

:

Jim is the income strategist

at Virtus ETF Solutions.

19

:

Jim, thank you so much

for coming on the show.

20

:

It's an honor to have you on.

21

:

Really excited about this conversation.

22

:

We had a great prep call last week.

23

:

Lot of fun.

24

:

I'm sure this conversation's

gonna be a lot of fun.

25

:

Can you please tell us a little bit more

about yourself and Virtus ETF Solutions?

26

:

James Jessup Income Strategist Virtus ETF Solutions:

Sure.

27

:

And first off, thanks

for having me on, Ryan.

28

:

I appreciate it.

29

:

And yes, it was great to catch up and

get to know you a little bit in front

30

:

of this in front of this opportunity.

31

:

So Virdis ETF Solutions, we

are part of Virdis Investment

32

:

Partners, publicly traded company.

33

:

Assets under management north of

150 billion, and the ETF business,

34

:

as has been the case in the

industry has grown significantly

35

:

over the last couple of years.

36

:

I've had the good fortune of being

with Virdis for 15 years now.

37

:

Most of that was actually

not spent in the ETF group.

38

:

I moved over here into this opportunity

about three and a half years ago.

39

:

Prior to that, I was actually mostly

in oversight and product development.

40

:

I moved over to here.

41

:

One of our tenants at Virdis is we

really do wanna meet our clients

42

:

where they are, and what I mean

by that is to be agnostic, really

43

:

around how they access our managers.

44

:

We have a wonderful mutual fund

business, but as I think we all

45

:

know, the ETF business, the SMA

business is coming along quickly.

46

:

Part of my responsibilities moving over

here was to bring some of our managers

47

:

who've had great success on the mutual

fund side, make them available on the

48

:

ETF side, and as well as get to make some

other innovative and creative things.

49

:

The ETF industry is a part of the

market that continuously is innovating.

50

:

Good, bad, or indifferent sometimes

but we do get an opportunity to try

51

:

to do some other things as well.

52

:

So my responsibilities

include product development.

53

:

I no longer have any

oversight responsibilities.

54

:

I get to go out in the field

a little bit, and occasionally

55

:

I get to do things like this.

56

:

So it's a fun role.

57

:

I'm fortunate to have it.

58

:

Ryan: Jim, that's fantastic, and

I'm really glad you brought that up.

59

:

Before we get into the fixed income

talk, let's talk a little bit about ETFs.

60

:

It's exploding.

61

:

That…

62

:

What is it, Jim?

63

:

There's more ETFs out there than there are

public equities, publicly traded equities.

64

:

The issuance of active ETFs, it's huge.

65

:

And then, like you said, all this

innovation, whether you like it or

66

:

not, I'm on the fence, there's some

of these new products I don't…

67

:

can't understand them.

68

:

How does a financial advisor

sit in front of their clients

69

:

and try to explain to them?

70

:

Anyways, how does Vertus and yourself

keep up with all these hot trends and

71

:

new innovation within the ETF space?

72

:

Keep up with it all, but also shift

through the noise and find out, okay,

73

:

what products really power do we like,

but also kinda stay on cutting edge?

74

:

James Jessup: Yeah, it's--

You have to walk the line.

75

:

As you're doing product development,

of course, you think about viability

76

:

from a financial standpoint.

77

:

Is this, I like to think of

portfolios or sectors as levers.

78

:

Is this a lever that an allocator

or an advisor would actually need to

79

:

pull or want to pull or be beneficial?

80

:

Yes, if you spend your mornings going

through filings of new ETFs you'll find

81

:

some innovative and exciting things.

82

:

But when you think about it from our

standpoint, yes, we wanna make sure

83

:

things are commercially viable, but

also, we wanna make sure we're bringing

84

:

forth something that we actually

think we have an opportunity to add

85

:

alpha in, something where we have a

manager who is genuinely good at it.

86

:

So yes, of course, you have to be

aware of flows, and if there's a

87

:

space that is garnering a tremendous

amount of interest, that's great.

88

:

But let's also take a look and say,

"Do we have a manager who actually does

89

:

something well here and in a manner that's

maybe not as widely available that we can

90

:

actually bring some benefit to the market

and some benefit to the shareholder?"

91

:

So that's really a core tenet.

92

:

I think a lot of and friends who are

in similar places, I think you have

93

:

to think about, what is my manager

exceptional at, and how do I deliver that?

94

:

And sometimes, I'll give a specific

example, sometimes you have a manager

95

:

who's really strong in an area like,

say, multi-sector fixed income,

96

:

which is a, an example for us.

97

:

And you look and you say,

"Wow, they really…"

98

:

If you break that down into pieces,

they do a couple of things really well.

99

:

One of them for us was securitized.

100

:

So we're like, okay, it makes sense

to bring forth a broadly diversified

101

:

securitized product that, that's a

place that a lot of allocators don't

102

:

have an easy way to get exposure to.

103

:

So now all of a sudden, in a single place,

you can get not just mortgages, but you

104

:

can get everything else, whether it's

subprime auto debt, credit card, franchise

105

:

receivables, et cetera, et cetera.

106

:

And so those are-- philosophically,

that's what you always wanna do.

107

:

Now, the point in the exercise of

course, is to be commercially viable,

108

:

but you don't wanna necessarily just

chase a hot dot, especially if you're

109

:

not equipped in that product lineup.

110

:

Ryan: Yeah, and I love, like you said

y- expand on what you're really good at

111

:

versus just what did Wayne Gretzky say?

112

:

Go to where the puck is going, right?

113

:

But also, not just doing it just to

do it and, a gap that you're really

114

:

good at, I think is important.

115

:

Because like you said, there's

a lot of noise out there.

116

:

You could be going down every rabbit

hole out there with the ETF space,

117

:

James Jessup: and the reality of

it is that's, that can quickly

118

:

turn into a fool's errand in

that, oh, everyone is launching X.

119

:

All right I'm gonna go…

120

:

by the time you bring it to market and

the time you get some marketing behind

121

:

it and some sales support, we may

well have moved on to the next thing.

122

:

Whereas if you focus on durable,

sustainable things, again, I don't think,

123

:

particularly in my corner of the world,

the debt markets, they're gonna be around.

124

:

If not, we're all in trouble.

125

:

So you can build things that hopefully

have a five, 10, 15-year opportunity

126

:

Ryan: Yeah, and real quickly,

last question here too, Jim.

127

:

There's a lot of new, like you said, new

ETF companies, new ETF products coming up.

128

:

easy to launch a new product when

markets keep hitting new highs.

129

:

They're resilient.

130

:

We've had this great run.

131

:

you feel a little bit concerned that

maybe some of these players might this,

132

:

the space might shrink a little bit if

we have a pullback, maybe an extended,

133

:

James Jessup: that there's…

134

:

Yeah I think maybe.

135

:

There, there will be some.

136

:

I'm not gonna pick on any of my

peers, but, you have some ETFs

137

:

that are extremely specific to an

extremely specific event, and some of

138

:

those, will those go by the wayside?

139

:

Probably.

140

:

That's the nature of things.

141

:

And to be fair, having spent as

much time as I have in product

142

:

development, a lot of things don't work.

143

:

We m- we make a lot of meals no one eats.

144

:

That's the nature of launching products

is some things are going to go away.

145

:

Now, from an ETF issuer consolidation

standpoint, I think that's a

146

:

bigger question, and I'm gonna

give you a very firm I don't know.

147

:

From a standpoint of I think the

ETF growth continues, but will

148

:

there continue to be cons- some

consolidation in the industry?

149

:

Probably.

150

:

But that's one of the great things

about ETFs is that if you can innovate

151

:

and you can deliver real value,

chances are you're gonna survive.

152

:

Chances are you're gonna be able to

continue to operate in those space.

153

:

Now, will there be some

tickers that go away?

154

:

Sure.

155

:

Absolutely

156

:

Ryan: For sure.

157

:

Great.

158

:

Thank you for that insight.

159

:

Wanted to pick your brain

on that real quick, Jim.

160

:

So now let's switch to fixed income.

161

:

Income, y- your specialty,

you're an expert in this space.

162

:

So let's just what's

your state of the market?

163

:

We've got a new Fed chair, like I said,

we've got current mar- macro uncertainty.

164

:

We got this ballooning federal debt.

165

:

A lot of noise out there.

166

:

What's your take on the

current fixed income market?

167

:

James Jessup: Yeah it's an

interesting moment, right?

168

:

We have a brand-new Fed chair.

169

:

We have a Fed chair who is probably

going to feel more political pressure

170

:

than their predecessors, so he's going

to have a little bit d- more dynamic

171

:

of a relationship in all likelihood

than some of his predecessors.

172

:

But when you look at the market

itself and you pull back there

173

:

is absolutely a tremendous amount

of noise, global uncertainty.

174

:

The Strait of Hormuz is open, closed.

175

:

It may open and close two more

times while we're recording this.

176

:

But with all of that said you can

listen to all that noise and you

177

:

can think about that, but then if

you pull back and you actually look

178

:

at the state of the market, there's

some things to be encouraged about.

179

:

One of them is when you look

at average price, and now I'm

180

:

gonna make a general statement.

181

:

Can you go find things on either

side of the, of two standard

182

:

deviation of what I'm gonna say?

183

:

Sure.

184

:

But generally speaking, the

market's around par, maybe

185

:

a little bit of a discount.

186

:

Market's hanging around 98, 99, the

bigger parts of the market that most

187

:

retail advisors are gonna be focused on,

whether that's IG, high yield, bank loans.

188

:

Even international, which is

becoming a bigger and bigger part

189

:

of of a retail market's place.

190

:

So if we think about it from that

standpoint, that looks pretty

191

:

normal, and we'll talk a little

bit more about defaults, I think,

192

:

later in this conversation.

193

:

But when you look at default

rates, those have returned.

194

:

They're below historical averages

from the global financial

195

:

crisis on, but they're in line.

196

:

So okay, so that feels pretty normal, too.

197

:

And then when we look at issuance

and subscription, and you can pick

198

:

the asset class on domestic debt

New issues are oversubscribed.

199

:

Whether it's whether it's in securitized,

whether it's an IG issuance, you're

200

:

seeing, seeing double subscription,

triple, quadruple subscription

201

:

on new issuance is not unusual.

202

:

So if you think about it from a

fundamental standpoint, that means

203

:

there's real demand for debt.

204

:

There's real demand for

income-generating instruments.

205

:

So that's a positive.

206

:

And to talk a little bit about the new Fed

Chair Warsh he's interesting in that we

207

:

now have two Fed chairs in a row who are

not PhDs in economics, they're lawyers.

208

:

So if you think about the responsibility

of that role I find it very c- interesting

209

:

that they're b- that are now two in a

row are legal scholars, Harvard-trained.

210

:

Warsh is also immensely qualified.

211

:

He's already been in the

committee once, so six to 11,

212

:

and he resigned on principle.

213

:

He resigned over the purchase of

treasuries in:

214

:

was $200 billion purchase of treasuries,

and he thought that was a bridge too far.

215

:

And he's an insider.

216

:

He comes from Morgan Stanley

as a deal-maker in MMA, which

217

:

means he's going to have a…

218

:

Hopefully, he's going to have

a very positive and, access and

219

:

information trade within Wall Street.

220

:

So all those things are encouraging.

221

:

Now, with all of that said, I think a

lo- a lot of us market participants are

222

:

hoping that the Fed remains independent.

223

:

Ryan: Yeah

224

:

James Jessup: you don't have

to go that far back in history.

225

:

If you go back to '71 under Nixon, his

Fed chair was not necessarily thought

226

:

of as the most independent person

in front of the '72 election cycle.

227

:

So we sometimes take for granted

that the Fed has been so independent

228

:

for so long but that's not a rule.

229

:

And so hopefully we do see that

continuation 'cause them being a

230

:

honest broker independent of any kind

of political exercise, the market has

231

:

done tremendously over the last 30

years, obviously with some pain points.

232

:

We do hope to see that kind of continue.

233

:

Certainly, some of the political choices

have been unconventional for some seats.

234

:

That's not the case here.

235

:

This is someone who's eminently

qualified to do the job and hopefully

236

:

does it as well as his predecessors.

237

:

Ryan: I agree, Jim.

238

:

And, there might be a little differences

in Warsh might vi- you know, he can be…

239

:

He doesn't want inflation,

but he doesn't also like the

240

:

inflated balance sheet, right?

241

:

That might

242

:

James Jessup: Yeah

243

:

Ryan: what the White House wants,

and stuff like that, 'cause those

244

:

are gonna raise interest rates.

245

:

So some things there.

246

:

But do you think also the power

of the chairperson's kind of

247

:

been diluted a little bit really?

248

:

Obviously what they say is very powerful

for markets and their statements,

249

:

they've got a committee, right?

250

:

That committee, the FOMC, they've

got a lot of sway in this too.

251

:

So do you think over the years,

they've kinda diluted some of this

252

:

power outside of those statements?

253

:

James Jessup: I think that's fair,

and I also think it's interesting that

254

:

Powell is staying on, which is unusual.

255

:

As a, y- of course he has the

right to do that as a chair, he

256

:

can, his term can put him there.

257

:

But you brought up an, you brought up

an interesting point in that one of the

258

:

things that was talked about most in the

media is how Warsh is gonna communicate.

259

:

Not even necessarily what

he's going to do, but how are,

260

:

how is he gonna communicate?

261

:

Al- Alan Greenspan passed

away yesterday at a, at 100.

262

:

We should all be so lucky.

263

:

But those of us who were

around when he was Fed chair,

264

:

it was a very different time.

265

:

If you remember poor Maria Bartiromo

on the front yard, and he would come

266

:

out and the big bag it was a rate,

and the small bag it was a cut.

267

:

We really didn't know what was

going to happen going into meetings.

268

:

And the, I think the market has

benefited from how transparent the

269

:

Fed has gotten over the years, and the

thought is Warsh gonna continue that?

270

:

Are we still going to get a dot plot?

271

:

Are we are the press conferences…

272

:

I read one thing where, the press

conferences are going to be shorter

273

:

and maybe not as transparent.

274

:

Time will tell.

275

:

People can…

276

:

It's like any time an e- elected

official or some, someone goes into

277

:

a new chair and they're gonna change

the world, and then they get in the

278

:

chair and they realize there's a lot of

institutional baggage that comes with it.

279

:

So I think we'll see.

280

:

But it bears watching, and the other

thing is for those of us that watch the

281

:

Fed futures on the Bloomberg terminal,

we're now at, for the 7/29 meeting a

282

:

likelihood of 35, 36% for a rate hike

there, which means one in three market

283

:

participants thinks that's gonna happen.

284

:

And those charts have been

absolutely all over the place.

285

:

If you chart those over…

286

:

It's fun.

287

:

If you chart them over three to six

months, it's, we're going, we're,

288

:

d- you know and you feel like those

things are written in pen, but they're

289

:

not, they're written in pencil.

290

:

They're gonna be, we're absolutely

going into a rising rate environment,

291

:

and two months later something happens

and we have great certainty that

292

:

it's a declining rate environment.

293

:

Ryan: Yep.

294

:

Yeah, what are we gonna do if

they get rid of the dot plots?

295

:

That graph?

296

:

What are we

297

:

James Jessup: I,

298

:

Ryan: with our time?

299

:

James Jessup: I think we're going

to I think we're all gonna be

300

:

collectively reading Fed minutes

even closer at that point.

301

:

I think that's gonna that's

what we're gonna be reduced to.

302

:

Ryan: I can't wait.

303

:

I can't

304

:

James Jessup: Yeah.

305

:

Yeah.

306

:

So

307

:

Ryan: you brought up default rates.

308

:

So let's touch on that real quick.

309

:

So many companies borrowed,

maybe refinanced, during the…

310

:

after the great financial crisis when

interest rates were zero, money was free.

311

:

Now we've got this, debt wall

coming up, higher interest rates.

312

:

Has that impacted…

313

:

You said default rate still remains

somewhat lower than average.

314

:

Do you think that'll change or, do you

think this higher for longer interest

315

:

rates have put much stress on companies

and what's the impact on defaults?

316

:

James Jessup: Yeah, it's…

317

:

Default rates are an interesting

one because you think a you think

318

:

if defaults are rising, that

may be a sign of trouble, right?

319

:

It just in intrinsically you

think, "Oh, okay we're seeing more

320

:

defaults, that means companies

are starting to run on a rope.

321

:

They can't refinance."

322

:

Like a lot of things, I think you have to

also look at this as a post-COVID world.

323

:

So if we go back to COVID, not that any

of us want to but if you go back to the

324

:

COVID era and think about it, we, in a

way, def- we outlawed defaults, right?

325

:

We printed so much money,

everyone got money.

326

:

Default rates went to essentially

zero because everyone was getting,

327

:

whether it was a PPE loan or I…

328

:

I've put a lot of those acronyms out

of my head like the rest of us c-

329

:

'cause of PTSD of Co- the COVID era.

330

:

But essentially default rates

went essentially to zero, right?

331

:

That's not a normal marketplace.

332

:

That's not capitalism.

333

:

If you are a bad company, if

you're a legacy company, if you're

334

:

over-leveraged, you should default, right?

335

:

We've worked through a lot of that

now, and to put some numbers around

336

:

that, historical default rates, and I'm

gonna use US bank loans and high yield,

337

:

they're histo- historically, post global

financial crisis, they sit right at 3%.

338

:

It's like 2.9

339

:

for high yield, 3.2

340

:

for loans, so call it 3.

341

:

We're at about 2% in high yield and 2.6

342

:

for loans.

343

:

So could those climb to historical

averages if you're a believer

344

:

in reversion of the mean?

345

:

Sure.

346

:

Could they go on the other side of that?

347

:

Sure.

348

:

Because if you think about it, historical

averages, you're going to go up or down.

349

:

Now, do we think there's a massive,

the, I g- I, again, I'm fortunate

350

:

I get to sit with our CIOs.

351

:

Do they see a massive default wall coming?

352

:

No.

353

:

Do, may we see some move up

towards historical averages?

354

:

Sure.

355

:

And that's, I think that's the

street's collective as well.

356

:

I think that's how people are

thinking about things, is that

357

:

the default rates where they

are, it feels a lot more normal.

358

:

It feels very strange if you're sitting

and you're doing high yield and nothing's

359

:

going wrong from a default standpoint.

360

:

To be back at those historical averages

to what I was referencing earlier,

361

:

bonds sitting around par, default rates

sitting around historical averages.

362

:

Tremendous amount of noise,

but there's some things in the

363

:

market that do feel normal.

364

:

Ryan: Yeah, it's interesting too, and

just, and we'll talk about this, but

365

:

we've all this uncertainty and all

this noise in markets, but we haven't

366

:

seen like much volatility in yields.

367

:

Especially, the spreads have remained

relatively tight and then, high yield

368

:

yields, it's not like they're fluctuating

and showing is- you know, distress.

369

:

Like you said, with defaults, you're

not really seeing the distress there

370

:

either with the increase in defaults.

371

:

So do you think, earnings good?

372

:

So do you think maybe that's why

we're in a market fixed income

373

:

isn't showing signs of distress?

374

:

James Jessup: Yeah, the term that I've the

term that I like that I've heard a number

375

:

of our credit folks use is this is a bond

picker's market, which is interesting

376

:

from a standpoint of it's not, "Hey,

we've gotta avoid this massive default

377

:

wall," or, "We've got to avoid X, Y, Z

sector because they're gonna be going

378

:

through, the Amazon effect," or whatever

it is, and it's gonna be devastating

379

:

to this one corner of the market.

380

:

Now, those things they don't have

the courtesy to let us know when

381

:

they're gonna happen, so it may

well be right around the corner.

382

:

But generally speaking, when you look

at the bond market, it comes down

383

:

to, it comes down to credit anal- an-

analysis, being in the right place,

384

:

avoiding the defaults but also finding

things that, you feel maybe a little bit

385

:

better about than the rating agencies do

386

:

Ryan: I'm glad you brought that up.

387

:

I'm a firm believer, there are spaces

in the equity side that you can get away

388

:

with being passive, large core maybe.

389

:

Fixed income, believer that you need to

take an active approach because, like

390

:

you said, bond pickers, especially in

this market a lot of opportunities,

391

:

even though people are bearish, I

think there are a lot of opportunities.

392

:

of those places that, some

people might take a…

393

:

find opportunities in is private credit.

394

:

There's so much concern about it.

395

:

lot of headline risk, I think, there.

396

:

It's one of those most polarizing topics

in fixed income is private credit.

397

:

Do you think-- is this a systematic

issue with private credit?

398

:

Or is it like you just said, there's

gonna be pockets of distress, there's

399

:

gonna be pockets where, maybe this isn't,

there aren't very many opportunities.

400

:

I-is it systematic or, are

we making too much out of it?

401

:

James Jessup: Yeah I'm gonna jump back to

one comment you made earlier, and I would

402

:

say the market would agree with you from

a standpoint of active and fixed income.

403

:

If you look at ETF issuance in fix-

active fixed income over the last couple

404

:

of years, it has moved up meaningfully.

405

:

Still a very small percentage

of the market, but that kind

406

:

of continues to increase.

407

:

And I think part of that is fixed income

benchmarks when you think about them,

408

:

when you think about an equity benchmark.

409

:

If I'm a mid-cap benchmark, it means

I define between here and here, right?

410

:

This is my market capitalization,

and every year, whatever it

411

:

is, if I got bigger, I go here,

if I get smaller, I go there.

412

:

If you look at our kind of most commonly

followed index in the aggregate, the,

413

:

it represents who went to the window

so if you look at that pre '07, it

414

:

was much more corporates, whereas now

it's much more government debt-focused

415

:

because that's who's been going to the

window, that's who's been issuing debt.

416

:

So I think even just rudimentary at its

most basic, that's a good argument for

417

:

active fixed income, 'cause you don't

necessarily always wanna be loaning money

418

:

to the people who are asking to be…

419

:

have money loaned to them nonstop.

420

:

So going on to private credit, I would

agree with a lot of your sentiment from a

421

:

standpoint of there is some headline risk.

422

:

There are some things that can…

423

:

that probably will go wrong.

424

:

I think that's inevitable in an asset

class or a sector that grows this quickly.

425

:

But what I would also say is this:

it's gotten very large, and it also

426

:

depends who's measuring, right?

427

:

So the Moody's number

is around 2 trillion.

428

:

Apollo thinks about addressable market,

and it's like 40 trillion, which again,

429

:

these numbers start to feel not real.

430

:

You start to, you start to

feel like you're talking, Dr.

431

:

Evil numbers that they get so big.

432

:

But when you have numbers

that large, the…

433

:

of course, there will be

parts of it that go wrong.

434

:

But I think private credit now has

to be thought of and talked about.

435

:

You've got to go a little bit

deeper from a standpoint of what

436

:

kind of private credit issuer

are you talking about, right?

437

:

Saying private credit is starting

to feel like saying bonds.

438

:

"Hey, what's the bond market doing?"

439

:

What's happening with my EM debt

manager couldn't be more different

440

:

than what's happening with

two-year Treasuries in some cases.

441

:

I think you could start to

say that about private credit.

442

:

If you're doing private credit, that is…

443

:

I think a private credit manager that

is doing, based on, hard assets that

444

:

are, office space in some, office

space in Florida or those sorts

445

:

of things, versus private credit

of a currently non-profitable tech

446

:

company that is, a hope and a dream.

447

:

Those are two very different

people that I'm loaning money to.

448

:

Now, to be fair, there's a place for both.

449

:

It's just I always think that particularly

in fixed income, because it's thought

450

:

of as the ballast against equities,

it comes down to really defining what

451

:

expected risk is and really being very

clear to the allocator or to the financial

452

:

advisor, "This is what you can expect.

453

:

This is where it will go wrong."

454

:

Because everything goes

wrong at some point.

455

:

If someone says, "This always

works," we both know that means run.

456

:

So I think that's, I think that's

the thing with private credit is

457

:

it's an interesting space because

it's gotten so big so quick.

458

:

But I think if you start talking

about will it go wrong, you've got

459

:

to start diving into the parts.

460

:

The other thing I will say, and

I don't think private credit

461

:

gets credit for this, is…

462

:

That was not intentional.

463

:

Private credit doesn't get credit

for being a liquidity provider.

464

:

They are a meaningful

market participant now.

465

:

They will take bank loan issuers

private, and they will all of a

466

:

sudden take a deal out at par.

467

:

That's a phone call that most

loan managers like getting.

468

:

"Hey, you're at 96, 97.

469

:

We're taking you out."

470

:

You're going to get par and now,

yeah, you got reinvestment risk.

471

:

But generally speaking,

that's not a bad thing.

472

:

L- a loan manager is generally

pretty happy to pick up three points

473

:

on a single issuance instantly.

474

:

And it's also, last point I'll

make on this it also gives

475

:

corporations an opportunity to

access funds two different ways.

476

:

And there are times where private

credit will be appropriate if they need

477

:

something quickly or all of the things

that go along with that, or maybe that

478

:

the access to the other markets, it's

just gonna be too cumbersome from them

479

:

that they can go to this other place.

480

:

So it is growing fast, but I

do think there's a place for it

481

:

Ryan: Yeah, Jim I completely agree.

482

:

And I'm glad you brought that up, the

important role that they play just

483

:

in the financial markets in general.

484

:

During-- After financial crisis, it wasn't

for private credit, where would we be?

485

:

A lot of corporations, they wouldn't

have been able to access credit.

486

:

They wouldn't have been able to

access money because banks stopped,

487

:

lending to these companies.

488

:

So they do.

489

:

I'm really glad you brought that up

of the important role that they play.

490

:

And interesting, right now on equity

side, we've had this huge run up

491

:

and now private credit, investors,

we often forget about risk, right?

492

:

When we're-- You know,

everything's going shooting to

493

:

the moon, everything's going…

494

:

We don't need to worry about risk.

495

:

Do you think that's a problem here too?

496

:

We ignore risks sometimes, and

we're seeing the importance

497

:

of illiquidity or liquidity

498

:

James Jessup: Yeah.

499

:

Ryan: everything's

500

:

James Jessup: Yeah.

501

:

Yeah, I would say this.

502

:

I spend my time in the

fixed income market.

503

:

I really I don't really do anything

do very little with equities.

504

:

I would say from spending time in

the field and I, have some teams that

505

:

I talk to regularly, I think on the

fixed income side, people actually

506

:

got a pretty good handle on things.

507

:

I think the biggest problem that

they're facing, and I know we're

508

:

gonna talk about cash here in a

little bit, but I think a lot…

509

:

The biggest thing people are facing is

how to deploy, how to get back into the

510

:

marketplace, because when cash is sitting

at five, that's pretty great, right?

511

:

But when that first number is a

three now I start thinking about, de-

512

:

deterioration of buying power because of

inflation and, that's a bad trade, right?

513

:

My inflation is rising and my

compensation for having cash sitting in

514

:

money markets is going the other way.

515

:

Suddenly that starts to erode on

buying power and total returns,

516

:

and suddenly the credit markets

get a little bit more interesting.

517

:

But I have found it, I have found

it that on the fixed income side I

518

:

don't run into very many, fortunately,

that I would consider reckless.

519

:

People generally have a good

understanding of kind of what

520

:

they're allocating to, and I will…

521

:

I would like to think we as a firm

do a good job explaining, 'cause

522

:

we do have some stuff that's

more aggressive than our peers.

523

:

That's a big part of our business, and

we always wanna be really transparent

524

:

on that, that, that income can…

525

:

Y- yield can be thought of as an, a

lot of things, part of total return.

526

:

I think you can also hold yield

out as a measurement of risk.

527

:

If you tell me something has a yield

of 8 or 9 or 10% and money markets are

528

:

yielding 4, okay, so if I'm getting

double the risk-free rate, there has

529

:

to be some risk associated with that.

530

:

That's just how the world works.

531

:

Ryan: I, I'm glad you brought that

up too about being transparent.

532

:

I think m- part of this issue

with private credit is, maybe

533

:

there's no transparency there.

534

:

People don't really understand the risks.

535

:

So I'm glad that what you guys are

doing at Virtus is you're being,

536

:

open, upfront to know the risks,

so then you're not getting that

537

:

phone call, "What's happening here?"

538

:

James Jessup: Yeah.

539

:

Yeah.

540

:

I think it's-- and I think that

in an age where information

541

:

is essentially free, right?

542

:

We have, your free stock app on your

phone is probably better data than

543

:

was available to a financial advisor

in the '90s in their office, right?

544

:

So if information is essentially free,

then it comes down to communication,

545

:

transparency understanding what

the portfolio is and being as

546

:

transparent as possible to give an

understanding of why something was

547

:

done or why something is being held.

548

:

I think that's where-- I think

that's the responsibility of

549

:

the industry now to the advisory

community 'cause an advisor can…

550

:

They can know everything that's in

the portfolio instantly, and they

551

:

can probably, using their favorite

AI tool or agent, as long as their

552

:

compliance group has approved it, of

course, they can determine whatever

553

:

they would like out of that portfolio.

554

:

The responsibility of the people working

with it is to give the thought process

555

:

why and what's behind it and what

to expect in a type of environment.

556

:

Ryan: That's a perfect segue.

557

:

I wanted to talk to you

about AI and technology.

558

:

had a huge AI issuance,

hyperscalers, you name it.

559

:

All these companies are

investing in AI infrastructure.

560

:

A huge surge in debt issuances

because of the investment in AI.

561

:

How does this surge rank in,

on a historical perspective?

562

:

And any thoughts there

on the AI debt issuance?

563

:

James Jessup: Yeah, the pr- I'm

gonna focus this on in-investment

564

:

grade because I think the numbers

are interesting and compelling.

565

:

2024, and we did a one-pager

on this that's out there, so if

566

:

anyone wants to see the chart.

567

:

Cap ex spending has gone up exponentially.

568

:

But what's interesting is the Cap

ex has gone up, but then the debt

569

:

issuance went right behind it.

570

:

So for a long time, this was done

off of cash, off of balance sheets,

571

:

and then it became debt issuance.

572

:

Addressable market in IG in

:

573

:

about two percent hyperscalers.

574

:

2025, it was seven.

575

:

This year it'll be more than that.

576

:

So it's conceivable that it ends

up being 10% of the IG marketplace,

577

:

which is an awfully big number.

578

:

And when you think about it from that

standpoint, if you're gonna equate it

579

:

historically the one that I heard on

AI that, that stuck with me was this is

580

:

the advent of us building highways in

the '50s or building out the railroads.

581

:

That's the s-scale that it starts to feel

at, that it's just this absolutely massive

582

:

part and important part of the marketplace

that if you're going to be a manager,

583

:

you're going to be participating in.

584

:

It's at that point you start have to

be thoughtful about where you are in

585

:

terms of issuance, which ones that

you hold, and all of those things.

586

:

But it's massive.

587

:

It's a massive part of the marketplace,

and I've had our IG manager comment

588

:

that his market doesn't really open

for a month or a quarter until a

589

:

hyperscaler does some sort of issuance.

590

:

So it is a huge part of the market,

and that's likely to continue.

591

:

Where can our audience get more

information about Virtus ETF solution?

592

:

Sure.

593

:

So virtus.com

594

:

will be the easiest place.

595

:

Then within there, they can

click into the ETF portion.

Listen for free

Show artwork for Adjusted for Risk

About the Podcast

Adjusted for Risk
Your weekly guide to timely market analysis, investment strategies, wealth management tips, and engaging discussions to empower investment professionals
Hosted by Market Strategist Ryan Nauman, Adjusted for Risk brings together financial markets, investments, economics, wealth management, and life to help investment professionals make sense of what's happening—and prepare for what's next.

Ryan sits down with industry leaders, investment experts and thought leaders to explore the trends driving markets and influencing investor behavior, from ETFs and SMAs to portfolio construction, AI, the economy, and the evolving wealth management industry.

Expect insightful conversations, actionable ideas, and a fun, engaging approach to the topics that matter most to financial advisors, wealth managers, portfolio managers, and investment professionals.

Cut through the noise. Gain perspective. Make more informed investment decisions.

Subscribe to Adjusted for Risk and stay ahead of the trends shaping markets, investments, and wealth management.

Adjusted for Risk — Cut Through the Noise. Invest With Perspective.

About your host

Profile picture for Ryan Nauman

Ryan Nauman

As Zephyr’s Market Strategist, Nauman provides thought provoking analysis and research on market trends across asset classes, sectors, and regions to help empower better asset allocation strategy decisions. His ability to navigate complex market dynamics and identify emerging trends has made him a trusted voice among investors and industry professionals alike. He is an accomplished investment strategist who has spent the last 22 years in the investment management industry ranging from working with plan sponsors, managing the investments of retail investors, and providing actionable thought leadership to investment professionals.
Ryan Nauman is the host of the popular Adjusted for Risk and Inside SMAs podcasts. He is a well-respected investment industry strategist regularly featured on Charles Schwab Network, Yahoo! Finance, Bloomberg TV, Bloomberg Radio and Chuck Jaffe’s Money Life podcast. His opinions and market expertise have been published in Reuters, CNBC, Bloomberg, MarketWatch.com, Yahoo! Finance, and the Wall Street Journal.
Prior to joining Zephyr, Nauman served as lead Investment Manager for a large financial planning practice. He also spent several years as an investment analyst conducting manager due diligence and creating mutual fund lineups for over 100 Plan Sponsors while overseeing $1 billion in defined contribution plan assets.