full

full
Published on:

3rd Jun 2026

How Financial Advisors Can Add Value Through Investment Management

Ryan Nauman hosts Zephyr’s Adjusted for Risk podcast and interviews Manju Boraiah, Head of Systematic Fixed Income and Co-Head of Custom SMAs at Allspring, a privately owned global asset manager with about $625B AUM. They discuss the evolution of systematic fixed income investing and why models require “hands on the wheel” as regimes change. Manju identifies outsourced investment management as a major trend, driven by advisors’ time constraints, customization needs, and demand for tax efficiency, fueling growth in custom SMAs, active ETFs, and third-party and custom models. They explore how advisors can add value through better goal-to-portfolio mapping, household-level portfolio coordination, and holistic tax efficiency, and highlight the industry’s biggest gap as “aggregation without integration.” Manju describes the move from UMA to unified managed household (UMH) platforms and how AI—especially workflow orchestration—could help integrate front, middle, and back office processes at scale.

00:00 Welcome to the Podcast

01:17 Meet Manju Boraiah

04:05 Systematic Fixed Income Explained

07:47 Big Trend Outsourced Investing

11:45 How Advisors Add Value Now

15:42 Unsolved Problem Integration Gap

21:22 Beyond UMA to Managed Households

25:07 AI Levels and Workflow Orchestration

29:27 Wrap Up and Where to Learn More

Connect with Ryan Nauman:

LinkedIn

X

Transcript
Speaker:

Go!

2

:

Ryan Nauman Market Strategist Zephyr:

Hello, everyone, and welcome to

3

:

Zephyr's Adjusted for Risk podcast

from the shores of Lake Tahoe.

4

:

I am Ryan Nauman, the market

strategist here at Zephyr.

5

:

talk a lot on this show about the

evolution of the wealth management space.

6

:

That evolution may be most evident in the

investment management segment of wealth

7

:

management, driven by fee compression,

changing client demands, and technology.

8

:

Well, I have on an industry expert who

is gonna share what he believes is the

9

:

biggest trend in investment management

and how it provides an opportunity

10

:

for financial advisors to add value.

11

:

But first, today's episode is sponsored

by the award-winning Zephyr, which

12

:

helps investment professionals

make more informed investment

13

:

decisions on behalf of their clients.

14

:

All right, enough from me.

15

:

I've already talked enough.

16

:

Let's go ahead and bring

on the star of the show.

17

:

I'd like to give a very warm

welcome to Manju, Manju Borah.

18

:

Manju is a head of systematic fixed income

and co-head of custom SMAs at Allspring.

19

:

Manju, thank you so much

for coming on the show.

20

:

It's an honor to have you, and I'm really

looking forward to this conversation.

21

:

It's gonna be a fun one, very insightful.

22

:

can you please tell us a little bit

more about yourself and Allspring?

23

:

Manju Boraiah Head of Systematic Fixed Income, Co-Head of Custom SMA Allspring:

Yeah, no, absolutely, Ryan.

24

:

Thank you for having me.

25

:

Look forward to our conversation today.

26

:

So in terms of just my background,

Ryan, just to set the context.

27

:

So started off my journey in computer

science engineering, then my passion

28

:

in mathematics and finance took me

into the world of systematic investing.

29

:

So started my career at a place

called Barclays Global Investors back

30

:

in the day after graduate school.

31

:

And it was a fascinating place

for-- to kinda start as a, as, as a

32

:

professional in systematic investing.

33

:

It really grounded me to think about the

intersection of kinda data technology,

34

:

investment acumen, and how do you actually

turn that into investment insights.

35

:

So started there building kinda hedge

fund strategies in the fixed income space.

36

:

Then kinda evolved, worked at

Goldman and a few other places.

37

:

And my journey kinda got

me to Allspring here.

38

:

And today I kinda lead two verticals

within Allspring the systematic

39

:

fixed income vertical and also

co-lead the custom SMA vertical.

40

:

In terms of Allspring itself Allspring is

a global asset manager, privately owned.

41

:

We manage about six hundred and

twenty-five billion in assets across

42

:

fixed income, equities, and multi-asset.

43

:

And our kinda core mission, Ryan,

is to really be at the forefront of

44

:

investing We have different investment

styles, fundamental and systematic, and

45

:

we've been bringing the two together.

46

:

We've been working with clients to

really kind of meet them where they

47

:

are, provide solutions to them across

both institutional and the retail space.

48

:

And our mission is to really you know,

be the best and the easiest asset

49

:

manager to work with for our clients.

50

:

Ryan: Yeah, Manju, that's fantastic.

51

:

I love that you said the

easiest a- asset manager to

52

:

Manju Boraiah: Great.

53

:

Ryan: Important.

54

:

And I've had the privilege of I had Noah

from Allspring on the fixed income team.

55

:

Fantastic people you guys have on at

Allspring doing some re- I love working

56

:

with you guys and, and great conversations

and insights, so a lot of fun.

57

:

Manju Boraiah: That's

58

:

Ryan: And

59

:

Manju Boraiah: Yeah.

60

:

Ryan: interesting you said that,

you know, systematic fixed income.

61

:

Do you

62

:

Manju Boraiah: Mm-hmm.

63

:

Ryan: A lot of people when they think

of systematic investing are, you know,

64

:

really more on the side of investing,

they focus more on equities than

65

:

Manju Boraiah: Great.

66

:

Ryan: Income?

67

:

Do you come across that sometimes?

68

:

They're like, "Oh, systematic fixed

income, we don't see that very often.

69

:

Normally it's more on the equity side."

70

:

Manju Boraiah: No, it is true, actually.

71

:

I mean, I would say when people

refer to systematic, they're

72

:

mostly talking about equities.

73

:

I know fixed income is hard to

model systematically, right?

74

:

Because if you think about what

the asset class represent, it's all

75

:

about avoiding the left tail risk.

76

:

It's all about avoiding

the, the bad stuff.

77

:

So it has been, y-you know, interesting

in terms of evolution of systematic

78

:

investing in fixed income, Ryan.

79

:

It really started off,

you know, in credit.

80

:

But back in the day when I was at BGI,

I think we were one of the two you know,

81

:

kind of establishments working on creating

systematic strategies in fixed income.

82

:

We covered the gamut in those days, right?

83

:

So if you've, you know, kind of

fast-forward to today it kind of

84

:

goes across sovereigns, FX, credit,

and, and munis as well, where you

85

:

can apply systematic rules to turn

your investment insights into factors

86

:

and, you know, really use those

factors to drive portfolio creation.

87

:

But I actually think that fixed income

or even in equities, you've gotta

88

:

have a hands-on-the-wheel approach

in systematic investing because

89

:

no model is perfect, as you know.

90

:

And you know, as regimes change,

models actually underperform, so

91

:

you have to have the flexibility

and agility to kind of make changes.

92

:

So I would say, you know, you have to

have the best autopilot, but you gotta

93

:

have hands on the wheel all the time.

94

:

Ryan: Yeah.

95

:

Th- that's fantastic, Manju.

96

:

I just can't imagine, you know, with

the fixed income space, it's huge, it's

97

:

vast, and I feel like creating a model

based on just all the factors that go

98

:

into fixed income, whether, you know,

inflation, the macro side, interest

99

:

rates, just a lot more goes into it.

100

:

I'm simplifying it here, but on

equities, you know, you focus on

101

:

earnings and, and stuff like that.

102

:

But,

103

:

Manju Boraiah: Great.

104

:

No, it's different.

105

:

Like, I mean, if you think about I'll

just give you one example, right?

106

:

Sovereign versus credit,

way different, right?

107

:

So the factors that you would focus

on, you know, when you're investing

108

:

in government bonds you know, you

have to think about the macro factors

109

:

to your point, like, you know,

growth, inflation monetary policy.

110

:

Obviously sentiment is kind of common,

like, you know, investor sentiment

111

:

and how do you express it, either

momentum or cross-asset momentum.

112

:

That, to some extent, is kind of

common across the different sectors.

113

:

And then you go and get into valuation

space, like how do you express, you

114

:

know, in sovereigns it's about carry

and roll down and thinking about the

115

:

different aspects of the yield curve.

116

:

In credit, it's different.

117

:

It's you're really thinking about

valuation more from an issuer perspective.

118

:

So there are all these nuances, but I

would say, you know, the approach that

119

:

you take where you think about the return

drivers in that particular asset class,

120

:

and then turning those return drivers

into factors, and then ultimately bringing

121

:

them together in a multi-factor approach.

122

:

I think that's, that's really

the, the process, right?

123

:

Ryan: Yeah.

124

:

Well, Manju, we'll have to

schedule another podcast

125

:

Manju Boraiah: Yeah.

126

:

Ryan: talk about, about that side.

127

:

That sounds fantastic, very

interesting conversation right there.

128

:

So get you on the podcast for that.

129

:

Let's talk about some of the trends

you're seeing in investment management.

130

:

Like I said at the open, there's a lot

of evolution in this space, especially

131

:

investment management, whether it's

been driven by fee compression,

132

:

that race to zero or technology.

133

:

But a lot of a- lot's happening

there for financial advisors.

134

:

And, and their, their plate's

getting bigger too, right?

135

:

Not only is it just investment management,

they've got to worry about, you know,

136

:

compliance, marketing, financial planning.

137

:

What do you feel is the biggest

trend investment management?

138

:

Manju Boraiah: I mean, I think all

the trends that you highlighted, Ryan

139

:

are essentially unfolding as we speak.

140

:

From a wealth management perspective,

I would say the biggest trend

141

:

that that I'm personally seeing is

really the, the notion of outsourced

142

:

investment management, right?

143

:

So if you think about You know, with the

advisor you know, how their time is spent

144

:

on a given day, they have lots to cover.

145

:

You know, practice management is

a big portion of what they do.

146

:

But being able to manage portfolios

for clients to drive those

147

:

portfolios to optimal outcomes,

that's, that's a challenging role.

148

:

And being able to navigate the, the

different macro scenarios it's not easy.

149

:

So what we've seen is the evolution

really started a few years or decades

150

:

ago, where parts of the portfolios were

being outsourced, obviously, through

151

:

funds or ETFs as, as the vehicles evolved

that those wrappers have evolved as well.

152

:

But what we have seen in the last

few years is really as customization

153

:

and the need for tax efficiency has

taken hold, more and more advisors

154

:

are looking to places like custom SMAs

or even active ETFs to essentially

155

:

deliver optimal outcomes to clients

and, and also bake in tax efficiency.

156

:

So we saw a pretty huge influx in

the last, call it like half a decade,

157

:

where advisors started embracing custom

SMAs across both fixed income and, and

158

:

equities, I would say active and passive.

159

:

So that has grown.

160

:

So taking that to the next level,

what you've seen in the recent past

161

:

is asset allocation itself, right?

162

:

Going beyond sleeves to the

overall portfolio, that's now

163

:

being outsourced through models.

164

:

So the concept of third-party models,

again, that has evolved from just pure

165

:

off-the-shelf models to now what's

referred to as the custom models.

166

:

The idea is bringing the best-of-breed

solutions from different managers and,

167

:

you know, offering those kinda like

white-labeled portfolios to clients,

168

:

and then evolving that through time.

169

:

So I would say that that's really

what I see as the, the biggest trend

170

:

so that, that frees up advisors

to focus on what they really--

171

:

where they can really add value.

172

:

Great,

173

:

Ryan: they want

customization, they want tax

174

:

Manju Boraiah: yeah.

175

:

Ryan: and SMEs provide

176

:

Manju Boraiah: No,

177

:

Ryan: Due to the outsourcing of that

investment management piece, like you

178

:

said, you could say manager selections

become, you know, commoditized.

179

:

You don't, you know, financial advisors,

like you said, they don't necessarily

180

:

have time to sit behind their desktop

and search for with the best sharp ratio

181

:

or lower, lowest standard deviation.

182

:

That's not where they're

getting their value from.

183

:

How can financial advisors add

value now in this new space of

184

:

outsourcing investment management

compared to when I started, Manju?

185

:

You know, financial advisors added

value in their manager selection.

186

:

"Oh, I'll provide you the best returns.

187

:

I'll provide you with

the best investments."

188

:

Now let's commoditize.

189

:

How can financial advisors add value?

190

:

Manju Boraiah: Yeah.

191

:

Yeah, no, it's a great question, Ryan.

192

:

I mean, I think it-- that's really

where I would say there are certain

193

:

gaps in the industry that advisors

can really fill, in my view.

194

:

So if you think about like,

you know, let's take financial

195

:

planning as an example, right?

196

:

So financial planning it's a

commoditized tool where you know,

197

:

advisors will get their clients,

they fill out a questionnaire that

198

:

questionnaire gets turned into a score.

199

:

And what happens generally is that

that score gets mapped to a portfolio.

200

:

And that portfolio is kind of

what the advisor would suggest to

201

:

their clients that they invest in.

202

:

Obviously, that there are

evolutions and flavors or…

203

:

of, of this process, but the process

of taking the financial planning and

204

:

mapping that to the portfolio, in

my view, is a critical task, right?

205

:

That's, that's where you're mapping

the objectives, the goals, and the

206

:

constraints of your clients to portfolios

that can be optimally structured to

207

:

meet those goals and constraints.

208

:

And that process is, in

my view, not trivial.

209

:

And to me, that is really where

advisors can add a huge amount of value.

210

:

And that's just for one account, right?

211

:

Or one individual within a household.

212

:

But can I extrapolate that

to the entire household?

213

:

How do you then kind of manage the, the

different entities and the different

214

:

individuals within the household

and create the best outcome for

215

:

clients or for the entire household?

216

:

So to me, going beyond financial advice

and, you know, kind of mapping that

217

:

to portfolios and ultimately managing

the goals and the constraints across

218

:

the entire household, that to me is a,

is a place where advisors need to step

219

:

up and add value The other piece is,

like, really driving tax efficiency.

220

:

So if you really think about what's

happening right now is as multi-asset

221

:

SMA managers Allspring gets to manage

parts of different sleeves within the

222

:

portfolio, be it fixed income or equities.

223

:

You know, we obviously manage that

sleeve in a tax-efficient way, but

224

:

that's just one piece of the pie, right?

225

:

So imagine what's happening

across the entire pie.

226

:

How do you coordinate tax outcomes

across the entire portfolio?

227

:

To me, that is also not easy, right?

228

:

So being able to do that across one

account and then again going beyond one

229

:

account to the entire household, driving

tax efficiency holistically across the

230

:

entire household is also something, in

my view advisors can add a lot of value.

231

:

And finally, you know, organic growth,

as you know, is hard to come by be it

232

:

asset management or wealth management.

233

:

So managing those relationships and,

you know, preparing for, as we refer

234

:

to as the Great Wealth Transfer, you

know, building those relationships

235

:

with the, the spousers or the, the

children is, is a key aspect as well.

236

:

So to me, you know, it goes

beyond just practice management.

237

:

It's and also relationship management.

238

:

It's really the aspect of managing the

entire household and, you know, driving

239

:

the outcomes, be it tax efficiency

or customization, but doing that in a

240

:

much more effective, scalable fashion.

241

:

I, I think that's really where

advisors can add a lot of value.

242

:

Ryan: Yeah, I completely agree.

243

:

And, you know, it add-- you can add a lot

of value despite, like, tax efficiencies.

244

:

You get more of a holistic plan when

you take into effect all the different

245

:

accounts within the household.

246

:

that can be a challenge too.

247

:

Not very many households

just have one account,

248

:

Manju Boraiah: Right.

249

:

Yeah.

250

:

Ryan: so that's a challenge.

251

:

What do you think is the

biggest unsolved problem?

252

:

Do you think that is?

253

:

You, you talked a lot about,

254

:

Manju Boraiah: Yeah.

255

:

Ryan: know, how to provide

256

:

Manju Boraiah: I,

257

:

Ryan: how financial advisors can

provide value in this era when maybe

258

:

investment management's commoditized.

259

:

But where-- what do you think

is the biggest unsolved problem?

260

:

Because there are some problems there

when you think of just time and resources.

261

:

Manju Boraiah: the biggest problem

I see really, the way I would

262

:

phrase it is really aggregation

without integration, right?

263

:

So if you think about the individual

account level what's happening

264

:

is, like these sleeves are getting

outsourced to managers, but being able

265

:

to coordinate tax outcomes across the

entire portfolio is currently missing.

266

:

So you're-- the advisor is aggregating

these different sleeves, but,

267

:

like, how do you coordinate across

these different sleeves, and how

268

:

do you deal with the best outcome?

269

:

You know, within that account.

270

:

So that's a s- that's a gap.

271

:

But, you know, again, taking it

to the next level how do you do

272

:

the same across multiple accounts

and entities within a household?

273

:

That is also, in my view,

something where there's a gap,

274

:

you know, needs to be addressed.

275

:

The bigger challenge, as you know, is

the app, and especially in the RA space,

276

:

as we've gone through consolidation and

there's a massive aggregation that has

277

:

happened, there is definitely integration

that yet to be, you know, happening

278

:

across the front, middle, and back office.

279

:

So that has definitely led

to portfolio management being

280

:

kind of like fragmented, right?

281

:

So the different teams are

still operating as silos.

282

:

The client experience

is fragmented as well.

283

:

So how do you actually deliver a

holistic portfolio management or

284

:

investment management and client

experience, not just within a single

285

:

book, but across the entire practice?

286

:

To me, that's, that's-- it's a big,

big problem for the industry, but

287

:

it's also a huge opportunity, in my

view, for the industry to transform

288

:

and evolve and, and get to a, a better

place from an efficiency perspective.

289

:

Ryan: Yeah, that's really interesting.

290

:

You talk about I love that,

aggregation without integration.

291

:

And you talked about, you know,

consolidation, a lot of M&A on the,

292

:

you know, fin- financial advisory

space, but there's also M&A on the

293

:

inve- asset management side too.

294

:

Manju Boraiah: Right.

295

:

Ryan: Some management firms

integrate, you know, merging.

296

:

So that

297

:

to, you

298

:

the problem of aggregation without

integration, which I think is really

299

:

fascinating, is it for financial advisors?

300

:

All right, just go with

one asset management firm.

301

:

They've got equities, international,

domestic fixed income.

302

:

They've got

303

:

Manju Boraiah: think

304

:

Ryan: whole suite of products.

305

:

Manju Boraiah: there

306

:

Ryan: that the solution?

307

:

Just go with one asset management

firm and try and have that

308

:

aggregation of household there?

309

:

Or are there other solutions to

this aggregation without integration

310

:

problem that you've discussed?

311

:

Manju Boraiah: are two

aspects to this, to…

312

:

You know, you, you made

a great point, right?

313

:

I mean, we have seen the consolidation

happen in the asset management world as

314

:

well, where the bigger become bigger.

315

:

And you need scale to be able

to cater to different needs.

316

:

Like, for example, at Allspring, we

have taken a more vehicle-agnostic

317

:

approach to solutions, right?

318

:

So we wanna meet the clients where

they are it doesn't matter if they're

319

:

interested in funds or ETFs or SMAs.

320

:

We wanna deliver the best solutions to

clients and meet them where they are.

321

:

So to be able to do that, you

need scale, as you pointed out.

322

:

You need to have those different

capabilities and the different

323

:

flavors, and ultimately deliver

those investment you know, expertise

324

:

through the vehicle that's actually

preferred by the advisors and clients.

325

:

But beyond that, at the-- on the wealth

management side, I think the challenge

326

:

really is Ryan, you know, how do you put

that all together on one chassis, right?

327

:

So if you really think about how the

portfolios are managed especially

328

:

in the RIA space these days, is you

might have the public part of the

329

:

portfolio sitting on one platform.

330

:

The privates might be

completely held separately.

331

:

So that unification of publics

and privates in o- on one

332

:

framework doesn't exist.

333

:

The other piece is like, you

know, how do you coordinate

334

:

across the different portfolios?

335

:

You really need going beyond the UMA.

336

:

You need a unified managed

household platform, right?

337

:

A UMH platform that is scalable,

that can actually provide a holistic

338

:

view of the entire household,

not just taxable accounts, but

339

:

also the other entities, right?

340

:

And then the, the kind of the integration

of the, the weaving of those different

341

:

pieces together and the coordination

of that, the orchestration layer as

342

:

I call it, that's really, in my view,

the biggest gap in the industry, right?

343

:

If you can solve for that, then, you

know, you can then embrace a total

344

:

portfolio approach on one chassis

where you can actually manage publics,

345

:

privates on the same platform.

346

:

Then you can evolve the portfolio as the

client's needs change, and then deliver

347

:

customization and tax efficiency at scale.

348

:

Ryan: Yeah, that makes a lot of

sense, Manju, because it goes

349

:

along with the holistic planning.

350

:

There should be holistic planning

on the investment management

351

:

side too, so you know that you're

getting the best tax efficiencies.

352

:

Manju Boraiah: Mm-hmm.

353

:

Ryan: Maybe there's not a bunch of overlap

and You're not overly concentrated in

354

:

tech or something like that, right?

355

:

Where you've got the full

holistic picture there.

356

:

You talked about separately

managed accounts.

357

:

A lot of people went from separately

managed accounts to unified managed

358

:

accounts to kind of bring all

those separate accounts together

359

:

Manju Boraiah: Yeah.

360

:

Ryan: Is that a solution here or is

there something even better or, you

361

:

know, maybe more comprehensive and

holistic than the UMA structure?

362

:

Manju Boraiah: The UMA structure is great.

363

:

I think what, what you really need to

do is going beyond UMA to UMH, right?

364

:

So the unified managed household to me

is an extension of an UMA's structure.

365

:

Now, UMA is great.

366

:

It solves for, to your point,

like, you know, how do you

367

:

bring in the different sleeves?

368

:

How do you kind of coordinate

across the different sleeves?

369

:

Now, not all UMA solutions are created

equal because there are certain UMA

370

:

solutions, as you know are name only, but

they don't really do what they need to do.

371

:

But the UMH is theoretically

a great concept, right?

372

:

So bas- basically, you have a UMA

construct but extends beyond one

373

:

account to the entire household.

374

:

You can onboard the different

entities, you know, be it like

375

:

taxable accounts, retirement accounts,

trusts, you know, public and privates

376

:

all sitting side by side, and then

orchestration of these different

377

:

sleeves happening on one chassis.

378

:

But to me, that is harder to

actually implement, right?

379

:

Because if you think about h-

what are the different pieces

380

:

for UMH to actually be scalable.

381

:

So you need a framework that can

actually house these different entities,

382

:

public, privates on the same platform.

383

:

You need a data and a risk framework

or architecture that can actually

384

:

provide a holistic risk view for your

privates and public on the same platform

385

:

Ryan: I

386

:

Manju Boraiah: or the different

vehicles on the same platform.

387

:

You need a tax-aware optimization kind

of engine that sits alongside these

388

:

things that can optimize different

sleeves in the entire portfolio or

389

:

the entire household for tax outcomes.

390

:

And finally, I think the biggest missing

piece is the orchestration layer.

391

:

How do you stitch this all

together and do this at scale?

392

:

So the individual pieces exist, right?

393

:

And they're also kind of like bare bones,

I would say, like, you know, early f-

394

:

you know, phase UMH platforms out there.

395

:

But to actually do this at scale,

I, I think to me, that's really

396

:

where the industry is heading.

397

:

I haven't seen a platform that can do all

of these things at scale yet, but I know

398

:

different folks are working towards it.

399

:

But that to me is the Holy Grail, right?

400

:

I think that's really where

the industry is heading.

401

:

Ryan: was just gonna ask why you were

explaining the unified managed household

402

:

structure and, and the benefits of it.

403

:

I was gonna just ask you,

like, how do you do it?

404

:

It sounds complicated, but most

importantly, how do you do it at scale?

405

:

I think you just answered that question.

406

:

Like, it, it's has not been done yet.

407

:

Is that true or are we close so

financial advisors can leverage it?

408

:

Manju Boraiah: Yeah, I think there are

structures out there, Rand, which come

409

:

close, but I think the biggest gap in

my view is I think the, again, bringing

410

:

the publics and the privates together,

and not just the publics and the

411

:

privates, but also the different pieces.

412

:

Like, you know, how do you have a

portfolio that can house mutual funds,

413

:

ETFs, SMAs, privates on the same

platform, and being able to manage

414

:

the tax efficiency across them, being

able to manage cash and liquidity

415

:

across these different sleeves.

416

:

That to me is still missing.

417

:

I know there are providers out

there that are close to the

418

:

finish line, but not there yet.

419

:

But we're getting there.

420

:

I, I do feel that that would be the, the

ideal solution for advisors to embrace.

421

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

422

:

I would-- I'm assuming technology

plays a big role in that.

423

:

Maybe AI, I'm assuming it, it

could evolve very quickly with AI.

424

:

Is that where it's kinda heading

towards in order to implement

425

:

it, is AI and leveraging that?

426

:

Manju Boraiah: Yeah.

427

:

No, I think AI is a great enabler, right?

428

:

AI, in my view, would play a huge role.

429

:

I tend to think about AI adoption

in different levels, right?

430

:

So there are, in my view, at

least five different levels.

431

:

So level one is really the easiest in

my view, where, you know, if you're

432

:

an advisor and using the AI-enabled

tools for note-taking or e-drafting

433

:

emails, it's really a productive

productivity enhancement tool, right?

434

:

Level two is where it gets a bit more

interesting, where you really think

435

:

about- You know, information retrieval

or research syn-synthesis tool, right?

436

:

And we do that all the time.

437

:

You know, you have a document, you

wanna extract information from it, or

438

:

you have a whole, you know, trove of

documents you need to kind of combine

439

:

information across these different things.

440

:

So that's happening as well.

441

:

You know, I know advisors and,

you know, professionals are

442

:

using it across the board.

443

:

Third level starts getting a bit more

interesting, where you go from just

444

:

information retrieval to more like

a, a decision support system, right?

445

:

So it's like a co-pilot where, you know,

working hand, hand in hand with a human

446

:

expert to actually do things, right?

447

:

You know, I wanna generate a new trade

idea, or I wanna do a certain task where

448

:

the AI is actually making investment

decisions or decisions in general.

449

:

And, and that to me is where

the industry mostly is, right?

450

:

So these three levels.

451

:

The fourth level is where you can

start orchestrating workflows.

452

:

So the workflow orchestration using

AI, where you're stitching together

453

:

different things and making decisions,

that is really where you can start

454

:

leveraging AI to do meaningful things.

455

:

And then the last level, which

is like the, the god mode, right?

456

:

Which is the agentic you know,

systems where, you know, AI--

457

:

where you're actually building,

learning and adapting dynamically.

458

:

That is harder to achieve.

459

:

There are very few firms that

are AI native that are actually

460

:

heading in that direction.

461

:

But level four and level five

is what really unlocks the true

462

:

advantage of AI, in my view.

463

:

Ryan: Yeah.

464

:

Manju, and I'm sure with their background

in computer science and then also

465

:

systematic investing, you have a good

grasp on AI and technology, so it's

466

:

always great to get your insight there.

467

:

Manju Boraiah: Mm-hmm.

468

:

Ryan: of AI.

469

:

Like you said, they're probably at level

one, two using chatbots and stuff like

470

:

that versus more the decision-making.

471

:

Do you think they're kind of

missing an opportunity there?

472

:

Or maybe they're just a little

apprehensive because of compliance

473

:

and stuff to really get to level five?

474

:

Manju Boraiah: Yeah.

475

:

So level five is, is

harder for sure, Ryan.

476

:

But level four, in my view, where

you're orchestrating workflows,

477

:

and to me, that is a key input to

solving what we discussed earlier,

478

:

aggregation without integration, right?

479

:

That integration piece where you're

trying to bring different practices

480

:

together, different investment

processes, and different, you

481

:

know, kind of like workflows you

might have in an organization under

482

:

one kind of cohesive umbrella.

483

:

That is where I think wealth

management and even asset

484

:

management should be embracing AI

and kind of taking that next step.

485

:

And it's harder for an

individual advisor to do, right?

486

:

I mean because you do require different

skill sets to kinda get there.

487

:

Because, you know, all of us do

wipe coding and all we can build,

488

:

you know, applications on the fly.

489

:

But just integrating something that

you've built with the broader workflow

490

:

and, and kind of testing the end-to-end

and making it really work is not easy.

491

:

But my view is like the home

offices should really embrace this.

492

:

I think this is really more for

the home offices to help integrate

493

:

the front, middle, and back office

so that it makes the, the overall

494

:

process for advisors more easy.

495

:

Yeah.

496

:

Ryan: Yeah.

497

:

Manju, that's a perfect way of

wrapping up this conversation

498

:

because you're exactly right.

499

:

With AI, a lot of what you just

talked about that, you know, unified

500

:

managed households becomes a lot

easier, and at the end of the day,

501

:

it benefits the end investor, the

end client because then they can have

502

:

more of a holistic approach to their

investment management tax efficiencies.

503

:

Like you said, maybe more diversification,

a better understanding of exactly all

504

:

their investments across the board.

505

:

So important and a lot to come there.

506

:

A lot to come, Manju.

507

:

Wow.

508

:

Thank you so much, Manju,

for coming on the show.

509

:

Really fun conversation.

510

:

You brought a ton of great

insight, a lot of information.

511

:

Like I said earlier, really like

this topic due to our, you know, my

512

:

interests, and I really feel that

separately managed accounts are a great

513

:

vehicle for investors and for financial

advisors to help with their investment

514

:

management portion of their business.

515

:

So thank you so much.

516

:

Really fun conversation.

517

:

Where can our listeners get more

information about Allspring?

518

:

Manju Boraiah: No, definitely.

519

:

And, and thank you so much, Ryan.

520

:

Really enjoyed this conversation.

521

:

And in terms of Allspring, you know

advisors can go to allspringglobal.com

522

:

or please follow us on LinkedIn.

523

:

And I'm sure you know there's a

friendly Allspring representative in

524

:

your territory if you're interested

to learn more about our products.

525

:

But thank you so much for having me.

526

:

It was a great conversation, Ryan, and,

If you're ever in the San Francisco

527

:

Bay Area you know, ping me and we

can catch up for a cup of coffee.

528

:

Ryan: Well, Manju, I'm just up

the road, up in the mountains

529

:

Manju Boraiah: Great.

530

:

Ryan: San Francisco, so not far.

531

:

Manju Boraiah: Oh.

532

:

Ryan: Careful what you wish for.

533

:

I might come down for a Giants game

and I may knocking on your door,

534

:

Manju Boraiah: Oh, yeah, please do.

535

:

And yeah, no, it'll, it'll-- it's

always fun to catch up in person.

536

:

Ryan: Yeah, exactly.

537

:

Awesome, Manju.

538

:

Thank you so much, and thank you

everyone for listening to this episode

539

:

of Zephyr's Adjust It For Risk podcast.

540

:

You can watch all of our other

episodes on the Zephyr YouTube channel

541

:

and all the other platforms where

you catch your favorite podcasts.

542

:

Please be sure to like and

subscribe to those channels and

543

:

give us a follow on LinkedIn.

544

:

Thank you very much and have

a great rest of your week.

Listen for free

Show artwork for Adjusted for Risk

About the Podcast

Adjusted for Risk
Your weekly guide to timely market analysis, investment strategies, wealth management tips, and engaging discussions to empower investment professionals
Hosted by Market Strategist Ryan Nauman, Adjusted for Risk brings together financial markets, investments, economics, wealth management, and life to help investment professionals make sense of what's happening—and prepare for what's next.

Ryan sits down with industry leaders, investment experts and thought leaders to explore the trends driving markets and influencing investor behavior, from ETFs and SMAs to portfolio construction, AI, the economy, and the evolving wealth management industry.

Expect insightful conversations, actionable ideas, and a fun, engaging approach to the topics that matter most to financial advisors, wealth managers, portfolio managers, and investment professionals.

Cut through the noise. Gain perspective. Make more informed investment decisions.

Subscribe to Adjusted for Risk and stay ahead of the trends shaping markets, investments, and wealth management.

Adjusted for Risk — Cut Through the Noise. Invest With Perspective.

About your host

Profile picture for Ryan Nauman

Ryan Nauman

As Zephyr’s Market Strategist, Nauman provides thought provoking analysis and research on market trends across asset classes, sectors, and regions to help empower better asset allocation strategy decisions. His ability to navigate complex market dynamics and identify emerging trends has made him a trusted voice among investors and industry professionals alike. He is an accomplished investment strategist who has spent the last 22 years in the investment management industry ranging from working with plan sponsors, managing the investments of retail investors, and providing actionable thought leadership to investment professionals.
Ryan Nauman is the host of the popular Adjusted for Risk and Inside SMAs podcasts. He is a well-respected investment industry strategist regularly featured on Charles Schwab Network, Yahoo! Finance, Bloomberg TV, Bloomberg Radio and Chuck Jaffe’s Money Life podcast. His opinions and market expertise have been published in Reuters, CNBC, Bloomberg, MarketWatch.com, Yahoo! Finance, and the Wall Street Journal.
Prior to joining Zephyr, Nauman served as lead Investment Manager for a large financial planning practice. He also spent several years as an investment analyst conducting manager due diligence and creating mutual fund lineups for over 100 Plan Sponsors while overseeing $1 billion in defined contribution plan assets.